ACLU of RI
ACLU of RI executive director Steven Brown issued the following statement today in response to the inclusion of a question about citizenship status in the 2020 census:See:
“As we’ve said before: A thorough and accurate census is essential to a properly functioning democracy, and including a question about citizenship will only scare people away from participating,” said Steven Brown. “We are glad that a federal judge struck down the plan to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census. We also commend officials from the state, and from Providence and Central Falls for their work to overturn this harmful politicization of the census.”
- Court Blocks Trump Administration From Asking About Citizenship in Census
- As Trump administration undermines the census, local leaders encourage Rhode Islanders to participate
Latino Policy Institute:
Tuesday’s federal court decision blocking the inclusion of a citizenship question in the upcoming 2020 census comes as a victory for states, municipalities, and especially many immigrant communities, including Latinos.
When the decision to include a question regarding a person’s citizenship status was announced by U.S Secretary of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross Jr. in March 2018, three Rhode Island municipalities – Central Falls, Providence, and Pawtucket – as well as good-government organizations such as Common Cause Rhode Island and the American Civil Liberties Union took the lead in voicing their concern and opposition. As stated in April 2018 by Central Falls Mayor James Diossa, “This isn’t about immigration policy or partisan politics. We are here because the federal government has taken steps that make it harder for the upcoming census to get an accurate count for all people in the United States.”
Historically, Latinos have been identified as a “hard to count” community during census years due to language barriers, income, education, and immigration status. The potential addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 census would unquestionably exacerbate this problem.
“Ensuring that the census is as available and safe for all communities to participate in is essential – in particular for the Latino community, which is now the largest racial and ethnic minority in the country,” said Marcela Betancur, director of the Latino Policy Institute at Roger Williams University. “Full participation in the 2020 census is imperative to the continuation and access to services and equal government representation, especially in Rhode Island as we face the looming possibility of losing a congressional seat.”
The Latino Policy Institute applauds the more than 161 mayors, 19 state attorneys general, and civil rights organizations that denounced the Trump administration’s addition of a citizenship question to the census for the first time since 1950 – a step that would effectively deter and prevent thousands of individuals from being counted.
About the Latino Policy Institute at RWU: The Latino Policy Institute (LPI) is committed to generating and communicating non-partisan data of Latinos in Rhode Island. The LPI will stimulate public policy discourse and enhance the public’s understanding of the Rhode Island Latino experience. With this information, Latinos’ social, economic and civic contributions to the state can be better documented, understood and engaged.
Senator Jack Reed
Today, after a U.S. District Court Judge blocked the Trump Administration from adding a citizenship question to the 2020 Decennial Census and found that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross violated the law, U.S. Senator Jack Reed issued the following statement:
“It is important to conduct a fair and accurate count of all persons in our country. The Trump Administration is attempting to undercount minority communities in a way that could take away federal resources and even perhaps representation in the U.S. House of Representatives.
“This ruling is a win for our Constitutional principles and a rebuke of the Trump Administration’s attempt to ignore, and in some cases violate, the law.”
[Note: a previous version of this post had the wrong quote from the ACLU. This has been corrected.]