Satire: The use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people’s stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.

Melanie DuPont was the 123rd person to testify before the House Judiciary Committee Tuesday night/Wednesday morning on a slate of bills both challenging and affirming women’s reproductive rights. She didn’t get to read her testimony on House Bill 5114 until almost 2am.

DuPont is the secretary of the Rhode Island Democratic Party Women’s Caucus and she unsuccessfully ran for State Senate in 2018.

She decided to register her opposition to Representative Arthur Corvese (Democrat, District 55, North Providence)’s “Unborn child protection from dismemberment abortion act” through parody: She suggested renaming the bill the “Testicular Fairness Act” and rewrote the bill to apply the substandard and dangerous medical care the legislation aims at women towards men.

“The gender-swapped amendments I proposed twinned the alarmist language employed by House Bill 5114,” said DuPont.

Dupont read to the Judiciary Committee members still awake and present: “…I contend that, any time my State Representative, Gregory J. Costantino, tries to abridge my rights as a woman, and endanger my life, I, Melanie DuPont, should return the favor, and try to abridge his rights as a man, and endanger his life.”

Here’s the video of DuPont testifying:

Representative Gregory Costantino (Democrat, District 44, Lincoln) is a co-sponsor of Corvese’s bill.

“It’s satire,” said DuPont. “I thought my use of the phrase ‘Testicular Fairness Act’ clearly indicated satire. Certainly, Representative Arthur Corvese laughing throughout my testimony led me to believe he, at least, understood the joke. Representative Costantino was not present when I testified.”

According to the Providence Journal, Corvese brought the testimony to Costantino’s attention, who then “called the state police… to ask them to investigate DuPont’s ‘threatening’ statements.”

The Rhode Island State Police visited DuPont.

It is unknown if Costantino has read the bill he’s twice sponsored, read the entirety of DuPont’s testimony, or understands what satire is.

“The gender-swapped amendments I proposed twinned the alarmist language employed by House Bill 5114,” said DuPont. “Representative Costantino, a registered Democrat, has cosponsored that Bill two years in a row, even though it directly conflicts with the 2016 Democratic National Platform, which states, ‘Democrats are committed to protecting and advancing reproductive health, rights, and justice.’ HB 5114 seeks to impede Rhode Island women’s and girls’ access to life-saving surgery. I jested that we take this opportunity to also impede men’s access to surgery.”

The story was amplified on social media when WJAR/Channel 10 reporter Bill Rappleye tweeted (here and here) that Costantino had been the recipient of a threatening note.

There was no note. There was DuPont’s submitted testimony, and there was no threat, as is obvious from even a cursory reading of DuPont’s testimony.

Apparently, satire and parody are alien concepts to Costantino, Corvese and Representative Joseph McNamara (Democrat, District 19, Warwick), who also serves as the Chair of the Rhode Island Democratic Party. McNamara, quoted in the Providence Journal, said that DuPont violated the law.

“It was certainly inappropriate, uncalled for, unlawful,” said McNamara. “She should be prosecuted to the highest extent of the law. I know the State Police have been notified. There is absolutely no place for that … in the political sphere.”

oDuPont seems t be keeping a good sense of humor about the ordeal.

“I spoke out against House Bill 5114,” said DuPont. “Every Democrat should. If Representative Costantino feels threatened by bills that infringe on his rights, all the women and girls of Rhode Island can clap back by saying, ‘I can relate.’”

UpriseRI is entirely supported by donations and advertising. Every little bit helps:
Become a Patron!

Newest Oldest Best
Notify of
Barry Schiller

It seems its getting harder and harder to out-satirize reality.
Its not criticism of brave Melanie Dupont to suggest a different idea for equivalence that maybe is more to the point as the anti-choice zealots likely wouldn’t even care if vasectomies were prohibited. Maybe the appropriate satiric amendment is that prostate surgery (to treat cancer, infections) is banned since it has potential to make a man infertile and/or impotent, unless he receives permission of his wife or partner and parents, has counseling from social workers or wiccans, must see videos of the actual operation showing all the blood, has a doctor certify it is medically necessary, and then has to wait at least 3 days before having the procedure.

Greg Gerritt

Does Representative Constantino know “his ass from a hole in the ground”?