Central Falls elected officials counter sue Wyatt bondholders under ‘Anti-SLAPP law’In response to a lawsuit from UMB Bank, representing the Wyatt Detention Facility‘s bondholders (aka ‘The Trustees’), elected officials from Central Falls, named in the lawsuit, are countersuing. After the Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation (CFDFC), which oversees the Wyatt, voted to stay a contract with the United States Marshall Service to house United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Published on April 29, 2019
By Steve Ahlquist
In response to a lawsuit from UMB Bank, representing the Wyatt Detention Facility‘s bondholders (aka ‘The Trustees’), elected officials from Central Falls, named in the lawsuit, are countersuing.
After the Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation (CFDFC), which oversees the Wyatt, voted to stay a contract with the United States Marshall Service to house United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainees, the bondholders sued. The bondholders named Central Falls Mayor James Diossa, Central Falls City Council President Maria Rivera and Central Falls City Councilors Jonathan Acosta, Hugo Figueroa, Franklin Solano, and Jessica Vega in their lawsuit, as well as members of the CFDFC board.
At issue were public statements from the named elected officials opposing the continuing operation of the Wyatt Detention Facility, and protests the elected officials engaged in.
- Central Falls Mayor Diossa: Wyatt Detention Center needs to be shut down immediately
- At emergency meeting, Mayor and City Council say they are done with Wyatt Detention Center
- Protesters march from Central Falls City Hall to Wyatt Detention Center to call for an end to ICE detentions
- Central Falls City Council members lead march against Wyatt Detention Center
- Central Falls City Council begins their move against the Wyatt by revoking foundational resolution
In a counter suit filed on April 23, Central Falls City Solicitor Matthew Jerzyk counters that, “the Mayor and Councilmembers have spoken out against the action of the Corporation and the Warden, as is their First Amendment right to do so.”
The counter suit continues:
“The words of Mayor Diossa and actions of the Councilmembers have had no direct impact on the Trustee, the bondholders, the United States Marshall Service contract, or the Corporation. City leaders have merely spoken out against the Corporation on a policy level and the resolutions passed by the Council are symbolic expressions of disagreement with no legal effect.
“The Trustee’s counts filed against the City, Mayor Diossa, and the Councilmembers are meant to silence the First Amendment expression of Mayor Diossa, and the Councilmembers who are speaking on a matter of public concern on behalf of the community they serve regarding an instrumentality and agency of the City.
“This is precisely the type of speech that is protected by G.L. 1956 § 9-33-1.
“The Trustee’s threat of litigation and damages of $130,000,000.00 is intended to intimidate and pressure Mayor Diossa and the Councilmembers to silence their statements against the Corporation.
“The Trustee’s suit is brought in violation of G.L. 1956 § 9-33-1 et seq., commonly known as the state’s “Anti-SLAPP” law.
“Mayor Diossa’s and the Councilmembers’ exercise of their right of free speech under the United States or Rhode Island constitutions in connection with a matter of public concern, namely the detention on the ICE asylum-seeking detainee’s held at the Wyatt, are conditionally immune from the Trustee’s civil claims.”
The lawsuit is seeking attorney fees, costs and damages.
UpriseRI is entirely supported by donations and advertising. Every little bit helps:
Become a Patron!
Did you enjoy this article?
More Civil Rights Coverage
Most Popular Now
- Photographer Alex Hornstein laments the wildlife lost to National Grid’s oil spillage
- Governor McKee’s tree lighting disrupted by protesters against homelessness
- Law students launch boycott of law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- 46,000 Rhode Islanders lost jobless benefits this fall. Hiring didn’t budge
- Travelers Beware: Flying Southwest Airlines Can Have Severe Consequences