Bill Sponsors
McGaw, Speakman, Boylan, Carson, Kislak, Cortvriend, Fogarty, Donovan, Alzate, and Spears
Committee
House Environment and Natural Resources
Summary
Select
This bill updates the rules for how the Department of Transportation (DOT) handles landscaping along state roads. It requires the DOT to plant native species that are friendly to pollinators, such as bees, whenever they are planting trees or shrubs for beautification. The DOT must consult with experts like beekeepers and horticulturists to choose the right plants and locations. These projects will be paid for using existing highway funds that aren't currently needed for road construction or maintenance. The bill also ensures these activities comply with federal standards.
Sponsor
Analysis
Pros for Progressives
- Promotes environmental sustainability and biodiversity by mandating the use of native plant species that support declining pollinator populations.
- Encourages science-based governance by requiring the Department of Transportation to consult with certified professionals like apiarists and horticulturists.
- Utilizes existing public funds to create ecological value alongside infrastructure, maximizing the public benefit of government spending without raising new taxes.
Cons for Progressives
- Contains vague language such as "when appropriate," which could allow the Department of Transportation to bypass these requirements and maintain the status quo.
- Funding is contingent on money "not otherwise needed" for road construction, meaning environmental efforts could be defunded if construction costs rise.
- Fails to address broader threats to pollinators, such as the use of pesticides or herbicides by the state on these same roadsides.
Pros for Conservatives
- Ensures that the beautification projects are funded through existing highway appropriations rather than creating new taxes or fees for residents.
- Focuses on native species, which are often lower maintenance and more cost-effective in the long run compared to non-native ornamental plants.
- Mandates compliance with existing federal code (23 U.S.C. 332), ensuring the state adheres to established laws and standards rather than creating arbitrary new rules.
Cons for Conservatives
- Expands the scope of the Department of Transportation to include environmental management, potentially distracting from its core mission of maintaining safe roads.
- Adds bureaucratic red tape by requiring consultations with various outside "experts" before planting can occur, likely slowing down projects.
- Prioritizes environmental signaling over practical infrastructure needs by legally mandating specific types of plantings regardless of local aesthetic preference.
Constitutional Concerns
None Likely
Impact Overview
Groups Affected
- Department of Transportation
- Apiarists
- Horticulturists
- Environmental Advocacy Groups
- Roadside Maintenance Contractors
Towns Affected
All
Cost to Taxpayers
None
Revenue Generated
None
BillBuddy Impact Ratings
Importance
Measures population affected and overall level of impact.
Freedom Impact
Level of individual freedom impacted by the bill.
Public Services
How much the bill is likely to impact one or more public services.
Regulatory
Estimated regulatory burden imposed on the subject(s) of the bill.
Clarity of Bill Language
How clear the language of the bill is. Higher ambiguity equals a lower score.
Enforcement Provisions
Measures enforcement provisions and penalties for non-compliance (if applicable).
Environmental Impact
Impact the bill will have on the environment, positive or negative.
Privacy Impact
Impact the bill is likely to have on the privacy of individuals.
Bill Status
Current Status
Held
Comm Passed
Floor Passed
Law
History
• 01/14/2026 Introduced, referred to House Environment and Natural Resources
Bill Text
SECTION 1. Section 24-8-11 of the General Laws in Chapter 24-8 entitled "Construction and Maintenance of State Roads" is hereby amended to read as follows:
24-8-11. Beautification.
(a) The department of transportation is hereby authorized and empowered to plant trees, shrubs and otherwise beautify the area within the limits of a road, including state highways in a manner and at locations as the department may deem advisable,. Plantings shall include pollinator- friendly native species when appropriate and the cost of the work shall be paid from moneys, appropriated for highway purposes, not otherwise needed for the construction, reconstruction and maintenance of state roads and bridges; and the state controller is hereby authorized and directed to draw his or her orders upon the general treasurer for the payment of such sums as may from time to time be required, upon receipt by him or her of proper vouchers approved by the director of transportation. The department shall seek suggestions from apiarists, horticulturists and other certified professionals to identify the appropriate types of plants and locations that benefit pollinators. For the purposes of this section "pollinators" means insects to include, but not be limited to, bees that help carry pollen from the male part of the flower to the female part of the same or another flower.
(b) Any and all activities performed by the department of transportation to benefit pollinators on roadsides and state highways shall be in compliance with § 23 U.S.C. 332.
SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.
24-8-11. Beautification.
(a) The department of transportation is hereby authorized and empowered to plant trees, shrubs and otherwise beautify the area within the limits of a road, including state highways in a manner and at locations as the department may deem advisable
(b) Any and all activities performed by the department of transportation to benefit pollinators on roadsides and state highways shall be in compliance with § 23 U.S.C. 332.
SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.