BillBuddy logo with smiling mascot and "Bill Summaries" ribbon.

Summary

Select

This legislation modifies the requirements for jury duty service in Rhode Island. Specifically, it updates the list of individuals who are legally exempt from serving as jurors to include anyone who is seventy years of age or older. While this bill automatically grants an exemption to these seniors, it also preserves their right to serve if they choose to do so by allowing them to waive the exemption. Essentially, jury duty becomes voluntary rather than mandatory for residents aged 70 and up.
Cheapest Oil Prices in RI
Sponsor

Analysis

Pros for Progressives

  • Protects vulnerable elderly populations from the physical and mental stress associated with mandatory court service and travel.
  • Respects the autonomy of seniors by converting a government mandate into a voluntary choice, acknowledging their past contributions to society.
  • Reduces barriers for low-income seniors who might struggle with the transportation costs or logistical challenges of attending jury duty.

Cons for Progressives

  • Reduces the diversity of the jury pool by potentially removing the perspectives and experiences of older generations from the justice system.
  • May lead to a decrease in civic engagement among the elderly population, isolating them further from democratic processes.
  • Could disproportionately shift the burden of jury service onto working-class people and younger individuals who may have less flexibility.

Pros for Conservatives

  • Reduces government coercion and intrusion into the lives of private citizens by removing a mandate for a specific group.
  • Demonstrates respect for the elderly and traditional values by acknowledging that those over 70 have already paid their dues to society.
  • Streamlines bureaucracy by eliminating the need for court clerks to process individual medical or hardship excuses for many seniors.

Cons for Conservatives

  • Dilutes the quality of the jury pool by potentially removing individuals with the most life experience and wisdom.
  • Represents a retreat from civic duty and personal responsibility, which are core tenets of maintaining a functional republic.
  • Could create a slippery slope where other groups demand exemptions, further weakening the citizen's obligation to the rule of law.

Constitutional Concerns

None Likely

Impact Overview

Groups Affected

  • Persons 70 years of age or older
  • Court clerks and administrators
  • Practicing attorneys
  • Jury commissioners
  • Litigants in state courts

Towns Affected

All

Cost to Taxpayers

None

Revenue Generated

None

BillBuddy Impact Ratings

Importance

25

Measures population affected and overall level of impact.

Freedom Impact

30

Level of individual freedom impacted by the bill.

Public Services

20

How much the bill is likely to impact one or more public services.

Regulatory

15

Estimated regulatory burden imposed on the subject(s) of the bill.

Clarity of Bill Language

100

How clear the language of the bill is. Higher ambiguity equals a lower score.

Enforcement Provisions

90

Measures enforcement provisions and penalties for non-compliance (if applicable).

Environmental Impact

0

Impact the bill will have on the environment, positive or negative.

Privacy Impact

0

Impact the bill is likely to have on the privacy of individuals.

Bill Status

Current Status

Held
Comm Passed
Floor Passed
Law

History

• 01/16/2026 Introduced, referred to House Judiciary

Bill Text

SECTION 1. Section 9-9-3 of the General Laws in Chapter 9-9 entitled "Jury Lists" is hereby amended to read as follows:
9-9-3. Persons exempt from service.
The following persons shall be exempted from serving as jurors, unless such persons shall waive their exemption, namely: the members of congress from the state of Rhode Island, the general officers of the state, the members and officers of the general assembly during their tenure of office irrespective of whether the general assembly is in session or not, the jury commissioner and his or her assistants, the justices of the state and United States courts, clerks of those courts, practicing attorneys-at-law, correctional officers, deputy sheriffs, probation and parole officers, members of any paid police force of the state or of any city or town, members of any paid fire department of any city or town, and members of the armed services on active duty, and those persons seventy (70) years of age or older.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.

Interact

Ask a Question

Coming in March

Tell Your Legislator

Coming in March