Bill Sponsors
Kallman, Mack, Quezada, Lauria, Vargas, DiMario, Tikoian, Pearson, Urso, and Thompson
Committee
Senate Judiciary
Summary
Select
This legislation modifies the requirements for individuals appointed by the governor to serve on the state parole board. Currently, the board consists of seven members with various professional backgrounds. This bill mandates that one of these seven members must be a person who was formerly incarcerated or directly impacted by the criminal legal system. To qualify, this individual must have completed their probation and parole at least three years prior and possess a background in specific fields such as psychology, mental health, transitional housing, re-entry, education, or law.
Sponsor
Analysis
Pros for Progressives
- Ensures that the perspectives of those with "lived experience" in the carceral system are included in high-level decision-making, promoting a more humane and realistic approach to parole.
- Validates the potential for rehabilitation and reintegration by placing a formerly incarcerated individual in a position of state authority and trust.
- May lead to better outcomes for parolees, as a board member with re-entry experience can better identify the specific support systems needed for successful transition back into society.
Cons for Progressives
- Designating only one seat out of seven may be viewed as tokenism, potentially leaving the member isolated or unable to significantly sway the board's overall culture.
- The requirement for specific professional backgrounds (e.g., psychology, law) creates a barrier that excludes many formerly incarcerated activists who possess wisdom but lack formal credentials.
- The mandatory three-year waiting period post-probation/parole could be seen as an arbitrary restriction that prevents otherwise qualified and rehabilitated individuals from serving sooner.
Pros for Conservatives
- Requires the appointee to have specific professional qualifications in relevant fields, ensuring the board member brings technical expertise rather than just personal history.
- Mandates a three-year period of clean conduct following probation or parole, providing a safeguard that the individual has truly adhered to the rule of law before judging others.
- Maintains the overall structure of the board while potentially adding practical insight into offender compliance, which could improve the efficiency of the parole process.
Cons for Conservatives
- Places a formerly convicted criminal in a role of judgment over other inmates, which some may view as undermining the moral authority and standards of the justice system.
- Creates a risk that the board member may harbor biases against law enforcement or be overly lenient toward dangerous offenders due to shared experiences.
- Codifies identity politics into state appointments by mandating a specific seat based on criminal history rather than simply selecting the most qualified citizen available.
Constitutional Concerns
None Likely
Impact Overview
Groups Affected
- Parole Board nominees
- Formerly incarcerated individuals
- Prisoners seeking parole
- Governor of Rhode Island
- Victims of crime
Towns Affected
All
Cost to Taxpayers
None
Revenue Generated
None
BillBuddy Impact Ratings
Importance
Measures population affected and overall level of impact.
Freedom Impact
Level of individual freedom impacted by the bill.
Public Services
How much the bill is likely to impact one or more public services.
Regulatory
Estimated regulatory burden imposed on the subject(s) of the bill.
Clarity of Bill Language
How clear the language of the bill is. Higher ambiguity equals a lower score.
Enforcement Provisions
Measures enforcement provisions and penalties for non-compliance (if applicable).
Environmental Impact
Impact the bill will have on the environment, positive or negative.
Privacy Impact
Impact the bill is likely to have on the privacy of individuals.
Bill Status
Current Status
Held
Comm Passed
Floor Passed
Law
History
• 01/16/2026 Introduced, referred to Senate Judiciary
Bill Text
SECTION 1. Section 13-8-2 of the General Laws in Chapter 13-8 entitled "Parole" is hereby amended to read as follows:
13-8-2. Qualifications of board members.
The seven (7) electors to be named by the governor shall have the following qualifications:
(1)(i) One of the qualified electors shall be a psychologist or a physician who is professionally qualified in the field of psychiatry or neurology;
(ii) One shall be a member in good standing of the Rhode Island bar;
(iii) One shall be a person who is professionally trained in correctional work or in some closely related general field as a social work;and
(iv) One shall be a law enforcement officer; and
(v) One shall be a person formerly incarcerated or directly impacted by the criminal legal system who has completed the probation and parole process three (3) or more years prior with a background in one of the following areas: psychology, mental health and/or substance use, transitional housing, re-entry after incarceration, education or law.
(2) All of the qualified electors shall be individuals who shall also have shown an interest in social welfare problems.
SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.
13-8-2. Qualifications of board members.
The seven (7) electors to be named by the governor shall have the following qualifications:
(1)(i) One of the qualified electors shall be a psychologist or a physician who is professionally qualified in the field of psychiatry or neurology;
(ii) One shall be a member in good standing of the Rhode Island bar;
(iii) One shall be a person who is professionally trained in correctional work or in some closely related general field as a social work;
(iv) One shall be a law enforcement officer; and
(v) One shall be a person formerly incarcerated or directly impacted by the criminal legal system who has completed the probation and parole process three (3) or more years prior with a background in one of the following areas: psychology, mental health and/or substance use, transitional housing, re-entry after incarceration, education or law.
(2) All of the qualified electors shall be individuals who shall also have shown an interest in social welfare problems.
SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.