BillBuddy logo with smiling mascot and "Bill Summaries" ribbon.

Summary

Select

This legislation amends the Rhode Island Noncompetition Agreement Act to significantly modify how and when noncompete agreements can be enforced. It establishes a salary threshold, making noncompetition agreements void and unenforceable against any employee earning less than $125,000 annually. It removes previous specific exemptions for low-wage workers and students, replacing them with this broader income-based rule. Additionally, the bill explicitly allows employers to sue employees for damages and legal fees if they violate agreements regarding trade secrets, while maintaining that agreements protecting customer lists and trade secrets remain valid regardless of the employee's income.
Cheapest Oil Prices in RI
Sponsor

Analysis

Pros for Progressives

  • Significantly expands labor rights by banning restrictive noncompete agreements for the vast majority of the workforce earning under $125,000 annually, promoting wage growth and job mobility.
  • Simplifies labor protections by removing complex eligibility categories (such as specific definitions for low-wage workers or students) and replacing them with a broad, protective income threshold.
  • Protects workers from "forfeiture for competition" schemes, ensuring that employees do not face financial penalties simply for seeking better employment opportunities elsewhere.

Cons for Progressives

  • Fails to ban noncompete agreements universally, leaving employees earning over $125,000 vulnerable to restrictive covenants that limit their professional freedom.
  • Grants employers new, explicit statutory power to sue employees for punitive damages and attorneys' fees regarding trade secrets, which could be used to intimidate whistleblowers or departing staff.
  • Relies on a fixed dollar amount ($125,000) rather than a dynamic metric (like a multiple of the poverty level), meaning inflation could eventually erode these protections for middle-class workers.

Pros for Conservatives

  • Strengthens property rights by explicitly authorizing civil actions, punitive damages, and attorneys' fees against employees who steal or wrongfully disclose corporate trade secrets.
  • Preserves the freedom of contract for high-income earners ($125,000+) and business owners involved in sales, acknowledging that key personnel are distinct from general labor.
  • Provides regulatory clarity for businesses by establishing a single, bright-line income test for contract enforceability, replacing a confusing patchwork of specific worker exemptions.

Cons for Conservatives

  • Interferes with the free market and private contract rights by declaring employment agreements void based on an arbitrary government-mandated salary threshold.
  • Prevents businesses from utilizing standard contractual tools to protect their investment in training and client relationships for employees earning under $125,000.
  • Expands the definition of "annualized earnings" to include various benefits, creating potential administrative burdens for businesses calculating who falls under the restriction.

Constitutional Concerns

None Likely

Impact Overview

Groups Affected

  • Employees earning under $125,000
  • Business Owners
  • High-income earners
  • Human Resources Departments
  • Corporate Legal Counsel

Towns Affected

All

Cost to Taxpayers

None

Revenue Generated

None

BillBuddy Impact Ratings

Importance

75

Measures population affected and overall level of impact.

Freedom Impact

65

Level of individual freedom impacted by the bill.

Public Services

0

How much the bill is likely to impact one or more public services.

Regulatory

45

Estimated regulatory burden imposed on the subject(s) of the bill.

Clarity of Bill Language

90

How clear the language of the bill is. Higher ambiguity equals a lower score.

Enforcement Provisions

75

Measures enforcement provisions and penalties for non-compliance (if applicable).

Environmental Impact

0

Impact the bill will have on the environment, positive or negative.

Privacy Impact

0

Impact the bill is likely to have on the privacy of individuals.

Bill Status

Current Status

Held
Comm Passed
Floor Passed
Law

History

• 01/16/2026 Introduced, referred to Senate Judiciary

Bill Text

SECTION 1. Sections 28-59-2 and 28-59-3 of the General Laws in Chapter 28-59 entitled "Rhode Island Noncompetition Agreement Act" are hereby amended to read as follows:
28-59-2. Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
(1) "Annualized earnings" means the compensation, including annualized salary, expected bonuses, expected commissions, or any other form of taxable compensation, reflected or that is expected to be reflected as wages, tips, and other compensation on the employee's IRS Form W-2 plus any elective deferrals not reflected as wages, tips, and other compensation on the employee's IRS Form W-2, such as, without limitation, employee contributions to a 401 (k) plan, a 403(b) plan, a flexible spending account, or a health savings account, or commuter benefit-related deductions.
(1)(2) “Business entity” means any person as defined in § 43-3-6 and includes a corporation, business trust, estate trust, partnership, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision or agency, or any other legal or commercial entity.
(2) “Earnings” means wages or compensation paid to an employee in the first forty (40) hours of work in a given week, not inclusive of hours paid at an overtime, Sunday, or holiday rate.
(3) “Employee” means an individual who works for hire, including an individual employed in a supervisory, managerial, or confidential position, but shall not include an independent contractor.
(4) “Employer” means any person, business entity, partnership, individual proprietorship, joint venture, firm, company, or other similar legal entity who or that employs one or more employees, and shall include the state and its instrumentalities and political subdivisions, public corporations, and charitable organizations.
(5) “Forfeiture agreement” means an agreement that imposes adverse financial consequences on a former employee as a result of the termination of an employment relationship, regardless of whether the employee engaged in competitive activities, following cessation of the employment relationship. Forfeiture agreements do not include forfeiture for competition agreements.
(6) “Forfeiture for competition agreement” means an agreement that by its terms or through the manner in which it is enforced, imposes adverse financial consequences on a former employee as a result of the termination of an employment relationship if the employee engages in competitive activities.
(7) “Low-wage employee” means an employee whose average annual earnings, as defined in subsection (2), are not more than two hundred fifty percent (250%) of the federal poverty level for individuals as established by the United States Department of Health and Human Services federal poverty guidelines.
(8) “Noncompetition agreement” means an agreement not to compete with a specific business or entity to include, but not be limited to, an agreement prohibited by the provisions of § 28-59-3(a) between an employer and an employee, or otherwise arising out of an existing or anticipated employment relationship, under which the employee or expected employee agrees that he or she will not engage in certain specified activities competitive with his or her employer after the employment relationship has ended. Noncompetition agreements include forfeiture for competition agreements, but do not include:
(i) Covenants not to solicit or hire employees of the employer;
(ii) Covenants not to solicit or transact business with customers, clients, or vendors of the employer;
(iii) Noncompetition agreements made in connection with the sale of a business entity or all or substantially all of the operating assets of a business entity or partnership, or otherwise disposing of the ownership interest of a business entity or partnership, or division or subsidiary of any of the foregoing, when the party restricted by the noncompetition agreement is a significant owner of, or member or partner in, the business entity who will receive significant consideration or benefit from the sale or disposal;
(iv) Noncompetition agreements originating outside of an employment relationship; LC004002 - Page 2 of 5
(v) Forfeiture agreements;
(vi) Nondisclosure or confidentiality agreements;
(vii) Invention assignment agreements;
(viii) Noncompetition agreements made in connection with the cessation of or separation from employment if the employee is expressly granted seven (7) business days to rescind acceptance; or
(ix) Agreements by which an employee agrees to not reapply for employment to the same employer after termination of the employee;
(x) Noncompetition agreements made by financial institutions, as defined by the Gramm- Leach-Bliley Act, engaged in insurance activities and financial institutions subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq.; or
(xi) Noncompetition agreements made by financial institutions subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq.
(9) “Trade secret” means information as defined in § 6-41-1.
28-59-3. Enforceability.
(a) A Except as provided in this section, a noncompetition agreement shall not be enforceable against the following types of workers: an employee.
(1) An employee who is classified as nonexempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219;
(2) Undergraduate or graduate students who participate in an internship or otherwise enter a short-term employment relationship with an employer, whether paid or unpaid, while enrolled at an educational institution;
(3) Employees age eighteen (18) or younger; or
(4) A low-wage employee.
(b) A noncompetition agreement may be enforceable if reasonable in scope, time-frame and application and the noncompetition agreement is entered pursuant to an agreement to sell a business entity or an equity interest in a business.
(b)(c) This section does not render void or unenforceable the remainder of a contract or agreement containing the unenforceable noncompetition agreement, nor does it preclude the imposition of a noncompetition restriction by a court, whether through preliminary or permanent injunctive relief or otherwise, as a remedy for a breach of another agreement or of a statutory or common law duty.
(c)(d) Nothing in this section shall preclude an employer from entering into an agreement with an employee not to share any information, including after the employee is no longer employed LC004002 - Page 3 of 5 by the employer, regarding the employer or the employment that is a trade secret, customer lists, including the names, addresses, identities of customers, or future business plans.
(e) Notwithstanding other provisions to the contrary, a noncompetition agreement is void and unenforceable against an employee unless the employee's annualized earnings exceed one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000).
(f) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to authorize, permit or otherwise enable the enforcement of a noncompete clause in any profession, occupation, or industry where such clauses are otherwise prohibited by existing state or federal law.

SECTION 2. Chapter 28-59 of the General Laws entitled "Rhode Island Noncompetition Agreement Act" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following sections:
28-59-4. Civil action by employer.
An employer may bring a civil action against any employee who, pursuant to an agreement described in § 28-59-3(d), violates that agreement and discloses or wrongfully utilizes trade secrets, and the successful employer may be awarded injunctive relief, compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs.
28-59-5. Severability.
If any provision of a chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are declared to be severable.

SECTION 3. This act shall take effect on January 1, 2027.

Interact

Ask a Question

Coming in March

Tell Your Legislator

Coming in March