Connect with us

Editorial & Opinion

How the executive director of the Rhode Island Democratic Party broke up a meeting of the women’s caucus — and kicked us out into the cold

Published

on

Thursday night was the culmination of months of effort for the Rhode Island Democratic Party’s Women’s Caucus. Our four co-chairs during the formation of the Caucus have been elected officials; we’re in the process of creating our first executive board made up of Rhode Island Democratic women. After months of preparation, last night, 14 members of the Caucus’ nominating committee were meeting with 24 women from around the state who were interested in serving on that executive board.

So let’s be clear — 11 days before Christmas, on a Thursday night, 14 Rhode Island women were at party headquarters to sit through four hours of interviews, and then deliberate about their choices for nomination to the executive board. On a bitterly cold evening in a snowstorm, 24 more women were traveling from around the state on bad roads to do a late-night interview for a position. I have two kids under 6, and I had moved my and my husband’s schedules around so I could be away and out late. Many of the other 37 women had done some version of the same.

While we were conducting our interviews, the executive director let us know that one of his staffers would need to sit in on succeeding interviews. He said the “integrity of our process” had been called into question.

There were two Senators in the room. There is absolutely no way that if there had been two male Senators in the room, the director would have come in and questioned the integrity of the interview process. It’s unimaginable.

We disagreed. Our process had been in place for months. We had promised each of our candidates confidentiality in their discussions with us. Even other members of the Women’s Caucus were not permitted to sit in on the interviews.


Can we please ask a favor?

Funding for our reporting relies on the generosity of readers like you. Our independence is how we are able to write stories that hold RI state and local government officials accountable. All of our stories are free and available to everyone right here at UpriseRI.com. But your support is essential to keeping Steve on the beat, covering the costs of reporting many stories in a single day. If you are able to, please support Uprise RI by becoming a patron. Every contribution, big or small is so valuable to us. You provide the motivation and financial support to keep doing what we do. Thank you.

Become a Patron!
Opens in a new tab - you won't lose you place

So, the fourteen of us — unanimously — told him, “no.”

And he then kicked us out into the cold.

He told us that if we wouldn’t permit one of his staff to sit in, we had to leave. The denial (in the Providence Journal piece) that this happened is absolutely incorrect. It wasn’t implied, it wasn’t hinted at — it was absolutely, explicitly stated, in a room with 15 people in it.

So the fourteen of us, unanimously, agreed to leave. We had work to do. We decamped to a nearby sports bar. It’s obviously ironic that a group of female Democratic leaders was more welcome at a sports bar than even at our own party’s headquarters.

But the director’s retribution didn’t end there. Next, his staffer — knowing we had agreed to move the interviews — contacted all of our upcoming interviews and told them they were canceled. When one contacted us, two of our committee withdrew from the interviews and phone-banked the rest of the candidates, telling them their interviews were still on, but had been moved. All but one came — one woman from Bristol had already gotten back home before our phone bankers reached her. We couldn’t contact the two interviews we were doing via videoconference because we didn’t have access to the equipment anymore. Nevertheless, we persisted. We got almost all of our work done. That’s what women do. We work around the obstacles in our paths and find a way.

The director’s retribution didn’t even end there. The party has now revoked access to all our written (online) materials about the candidates. The party controls those now, and that makes it impossible to enforce the promises the Caucus made to the candidates about confidentiality.

It’s vindictive. A political party is taking vindictive, punitive action against its women because we wouldn’t yield.

What a way to wind up 2017. With all that’s happening with women’s activism around the country — the largest political demonstration in American history in January, unprecedented numbers of women running for office — our Rhode Island Democratic Party still thinks it’s the 1950s. Even after women let the party know that we wouldn’t stand for Joe DeLorenzo being in a position of leadership — and, by the way, the Party never took a stand on whether DeLorenzo should go or not — the Party still apparently has not learned to treat its female members and leaders with the respect they have earned.

Things are harder for women in politics. It’s still a male-dominated area. Fourteen women giving up their Thursday evening were outvoted by one guy and sent into the freezing cold, ending up in another male-dominated space — a sports bar — to continue working on our mission of building more female leadership.

But we know how to work hard.

But we will not accept being treated as second-class members of our Party. Over half the votes that elect Democratic officeholders come from women. We’d rather be fighting the Trump agenda. We want a Party where we’re fairly represented — where women have an equal seat at the table, and good men and women work together to advance the Democratic Party’s values — providing safe access to abortion, making sure every child can receive a good education, making sure all Americans have access to affordable, quality health care. Lots of men and women share those values. We shouldn’t have to fight for an equal seat at the table in our own Party. But if we must, we will.