Skip to main content
Government·July 14, 2026

Woonsocket Council Advances Sidewalk E-Bike Ban, Clarifies Red Light Camera Fines Aren't Capped by State Law

The Woonsocket City Council finalized a ban on e-bikes and motorized bicycles on sidewalks and walked back an earlier claim that state law caps red light camera fines at $85, while residents raised concerns about housing code enforcement, homelessness, and school zone signage.

An editorial illustration shows an electric bicycle beside a city sidewalk while anonymous Woonsocket council members deliberate over traffic-safety…
Why This Matters

Motorized and battery-powered bicycles are now banned from Woonsocket sidewalks under a newly finalized ordinance. The council also clarified that state law does not cap red light camera fines at $85, keeping more flexibility as the city moves toward a camera program, and heard public concerns about a stalled housing code complaint and missing school zone signs downtown.

The Woonsocket City Council, meeting Monday, gave second and final passage to an ordinance banning motorized and battery-powered bicycles from city sidewalks, one of several routine but consequential items taken up during a meeting dominated by public comment on housing conditions, homelessness, and traffic safety, according to the town's published meeting recording.

Sidewalk e-bike ban passes The amendment to Chapter 16 of the city code adds a new section prohibiting battery-powered and motorized bicycles on sidewalks. One council member said the rule distinguishes sidewalks, meant for pedestrians, from streets, where such bikes are legally permitted, and urged parents to consider whether young children should be riding e-bikes capable of high speeds before letting them do so illegally on sidewalks. The ordinance passed by a 7-0 roll call vote on second passage, making it final.

Red light camera fine limit debate A council member who had raised concerns at the June 15 meeting that state law might cap red light camera fines at $85 said, after further review with the city solicitor, that the specific statute cited does not actually set that limit for red light cameras — it applies to school zone speed cameras, which are capped at $50. The council member who first raised the question said she was glad to be wrong, arguing it was worth flagging the issue early to avoid a legal misstep as the city moves toward implementing red light cameras. The solicitor's office is expected to draft ordinances to keep any future program in compliance with state law; no fine amount or contract has been finalized.

Public comment on housing violations A resident told the council she has been living with a severe pest infestation, standing water in her basement, and what she said was an illegally converted three-bedroom unit, despite filing a complaint with code enforcement in December 2025. She said she was told repeatedly that her case was "pending" and that code enforcement recently closed her case and asked her to refile, after she said her emails to the mayor's office were not reaching him directly. The council president said he would raise the matter with the mayor and asked her to leave her documentation with the clerk for review. No formal council action was taken on the complaint.

Homelessness and encampments Several speakers addressed homelessness and public drug use downtown, including a resident who argued that clearing encampments without providing services simply displaces the problem to other towns, and who is running for U.S. House in Rhode Island's first district. No council action followed; the comments were part of the public comment period, which is not a forum for the council to debate or vote.

School zone speed limits raised A resident who identified himself as a certified traffic investigator presented stopping-distance calculations for various speeds and said four schools in the downtown area — RISE Prep, RISE Prep Upper Academy, Founders, and Beacon — currently lack posted school zone signage. He asked the city to address this before the new school year. No agenda item addressed this directly, and it remains a matter for the administration to consider.

ARPA funds and DPW positions The public works director asked the mayor, finance director, and council to consider consolidating roughly $96,000 in unused federal pandemic relief funds from multiple capital projects — including a water department utility building, a track and field project, and a new animal shelter — so the money could be redirected to road and sidewalk repairs already put out to bid. Council members said they would need to review a prior ordinance governing how leftover funds must be used before deciding. The director also urged the administration and Local 670, the city's public works union, to reach a new labor agreement, saying it is the lowest-paid union in the city and that hiring delays could leave the city short-staffed for winter operations by November.

Other votes The council also gave first passage, 7-0, to two ordinances authorizing new utility poles on Rockridge Drive; approved a one-year extension of a records management system contract with Numo Group; accepted a federal cybersecurity grant through the Rhode Island Emergency Management Agency with no local funding match required; ratified payroll service agreements with ADP and Ceridian; and approved continuing environmental cleanup work at the 719 River Street brownfield site. A council member questioned where the city's required $130,000 local match for that cleanup project is coming from and asked the finance department to clarify; the item passed 7-0 pending that follow-up.

The council also approved, 6-0 with one recusal, the city's 2026-2030 consolidated plan governing federal community development, housing, and homelessness grant funding for the coming year.

What's next The public works director said he plans to bring an accounting of unused federal relief funds back to the council at a future meeting, and the mayor's office said it would follow up with the resident who reported the housing violations. The council did not set a specific date for further action on red light cameras, which remains under review by the solicitor's office.

Share this storyTwitter / XFacebookBluesky

Support Independent Journalism

Uprise RI provides free, independent coverage of the issues that matter to Rhode Islanders. Reporting like this takes time — your support keeps it free for everyone.

Support Us