Rep Joe Almeida: Why I Voted Against MattielloI voted against the Rhode Island House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello as a member of the so-called gang of 21. I received such accolades and am deeply honored for all the support. This vote was not easy; I knew Mattiello for a long time. I understood he had the votes to remain speaking but wanted to send a message that I
Published on November 9, 2018
By Joe Almeida
I voted against the Rhode Island House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello as a member of the so-called gang of 21. I received such accolades and am deeply honored for all the support. This vote was not easy; I knew Mattiello for a long time. I understood he had the votes to remain speaking but wanted to send a message that I could not support him as of now.
First I want to acknowledge I consider Mattiello a friend. Just because I disagree with some decisions he made does not mean I wish him any ill will. I also do not consider myself “ultra-progressive,” but I do consider myself someone who is a voice for the minority community, one voice among many others that hope to make our state a little better.
Mattiello does have an impressive track record. He delivered for our state and has a difficult job, but even with all that, I felt it was necessary to vote against him this time. Mattiello has always shown me a great deal of loyalty and I have shown it back.
However, I felt disappointed during his most recent tenure as Speaker. I want to make clear there are different reasons for voting against Mattiello. My reason is one among many. My peers that voted against Mattiello deserve to be heard loud and clear even if my house colleagues disagree with them. That is what makes our Democracy so great: the ability to respectfully disagree.
I was included in a press release expressing and supporting greater transparency and fairness along with my house peers. I do support those ideas, but that wasn’t my primary motivation. I was disappointed in some of his decisions as Speaker related to diversity. Mattiello promised to enhance diversity throughout our great state, but the vital programs I supported were cast aside for other priorities. We always talk about economic development yet that economic development doesn’t seem to make it to the most impoverished places in Rhode Island.
The General Assembly needs to place greater emphasis on diversity and provide our minority community with more economic opportunities. It needs to create more state programs that ensure minorities have a fighting chance in a world that seems to be stacked against them. This is something that I am passionate about and something I think we should all strive to achieve.
My vote was not directed at the Speaker, but I don’t believe his priorities align with the constituents of our fine Providence community and minorities across our state. One day I hope to vote for Mattiello, but unfortunately, today is not that day.
Did you enjoy this article?
More Editorial & Opinion Coverage
Coalition condemns Cranston Police charging 11 alleged sex trafficking victims & calling it “rescue”“Arrest is not help. Prostitution stings are exploitive and traumatic, and prostitution charges make it difficult or impossible for the ‘rescued’ arrestee to find work outside of the adult industry.”...
Most Popular Now
- As eviction moratorium ends, renters begin to call out landlords
- Paid Leave for All National Bus Tour kicks off from Rhode Island
- ACLU sues RI Dept of Corrections over continued incarceration of inmates granted ...
- RI Transit Riders demands a responsible approach to central bus hub
- Representative Moira Walsh: The exit interview