The Tribal Council of the Narragansett Indian Tribe (NIT) has filed a motion to intervene in the Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB) hearings on Invenergy’s proposed $1 billion fracked gas and diesel oil burning power plant aimed at the forests of northwestern Rhode Island. A majority of the current Tribal Council members have determined to seek intervenor status.
The Tribal Council maintains that the deal to provide water to cool the proposed power plant’s turbines, reached between Tribal Leadership and Invenergy, is invalid.
“There’s a constitution in this tribe,” said Domingo Talldog Monroe to RI Future reporter Bob Plain. “The body is the final say. That’s the way it is set up through our bi-laws and constitution as a tribe. If it would have went through the proper protocol and procedure it would have been brought to the tribal body meeting and it would have been brought to the people so we could put a motion on the floor and vote on it. That never happened.”
The Tribal Council maintains that they are not adequately represented by existing parties. Noting that local (Burrillville), environmental (Conservation Law Foundation) and labor interests (Building Trades) are represented in the hearings, the motion declares that none “of the current intervenors is capable of representing the interests of the Tribal Council in this docket.”
Recently the EFSB granted intervenor status to the Town of Charlestown. Like Charlestown, the Tribal Council has not been able to evaluate the agreement reached between Tribal Leadership and Invenergy.
The “text of this supplemental plan makes it clear that Invenergy plans to draw water from the Lower Wood River Aquifer, ostensibly using existing tribal well infrastructure… The outcome of the EFSB’s decision, should it precipitate or allow for the sale of any of the Tribe’s water, even on a contingent basis, could potentially bind Narragansett Tribal Members and the Tribal Council charged with representing them, for generations to come.”
The Tribal Council has strong reasons for not believing their interests are represented by the Town of Charlestown, even putting aside “any of the historic and sometimes recurring tensions that arise between the municipality and the Tribe.”
“That the Town and the NIT share a single sole-source aquifer does not bind their interest in this matter; instead it creates the potential for them to be adverse actors competing for the same limited resource,” says the motion to intervene. “Charlestown must represent the interests of a specific population: its residents. The Tribal Council must represent the interests of a distinct population: its members. While there may be and one can certainly hope for occasions where these interests align, it would be foolish and short-sighted for anyone to assume that the Town of Charlestown can represent the interests of the Tribal Council.”
Can you help Uprise RI?
Funding for our reporting relies on the generosity of readers like you. Our independence allows us to write stories that hold RI state and local government officials accountable. All of our stories are free and available to everyone. But your support is essential to keeping Steve and Will on the beat, covering the costs of reporting many stories in a single day. If you are able to, please support Uprise RI. Every contribution, big or small is so valuable to us. You provide the motivation and financial support to keep doing what we do. Thank you.
Attorney Shannah Kurland, representing the Tribal Council, writes eloquently on behalf of the tribe, as in this passage:
“‘Water is life’ has become a familiar maxim to Native and non-Native peoples throughout the Americas in recent times, much of it due to concerns regarding the impact of contested development projects on water supply in Indian Country. Here, the actual site proposed for the Clear River Energy Center in Burrillville is roughly fifty miles from Narragansett tribal lands, a distance considered ‘far’ by Rhode Island standards. Yet the proposed purchase by Invenergy of water from tribal lands brings the issue as close to home physically, economically, and culturally as possible.”